Videospiel-Diskussions-Thread

[Gast]

Bei Among Us steht und fällt aber alles mit den Spielern. Brauchen ja nicht hier auch noch die Tests sezieren. Als Tester schnappt man sich nicht mal eben drei beste Freunde und taucht in so einen Titel ein.

@cM0:

Oh Dragon Quests... hoffentlich kommen sie nochmal wieder. 7 hatte ich auf der PSX importiert und durchgesuchtet, obwohl es grafisch kaum mehr als NES Niveau war. Dragon Quest 8 auf PS2 war auch großartig. 9 habe ich leider nie gespielt. Gab es bei uns auch nicht?
Das ist eine Serie die für mich persönlich Final Fantasy inzwischen in allen Belangen ersetzt. Inzwischen kann ich mich sogar mit dem Midi Sound arrangieren.

@Fire Emblem. Uff, 2 Stunden in die Nacht rein gezockt, nur wegen dem Duma Tower. Wenigstens einen Speicherpunkt hätten sie da reinhauen können. Dafür steh ich jetzt direkt vorm Boss.

[johndoe571688]

Die grafischen Verbesserungen bei der Nioh Collection für PS5 halten sich auf den ersten Blick arg in Grenzen.

Ich bin noch am hadern ob ich mir die Collection hole. Hatte Teil 2 nie gespielt, war abgeschreckt weil meine PS4 Pro da im absoluten Tornado Modus war, schon in der Demo. Auf der PS5 würde mich vor allem mal der 120FPS Mode interessieren.

Ansonsten hab ich folgendes angezockt:

- God of War (PS5)
Mit dem neuem Patch für 4k60. Das spiel sieht einfach unglaublich gut aus für einen PS4 Titel. Da mag ich mir garnicht ausdenken was mit dem Nachfolger auf PS5 los sein wird. Werd's auf jeden Fall nochmal durchspielen.

- Control (PS5)
Der Performance Mode (60 FPS) spielt sich richtig schön flüssig, die Kämpfe machen Spaß, das Spiel an sich hat nen coolen Style und Look. Der Grafik Mode (30FPS+Raytracing) hingegen ist in schnellen Spielszenen komplett Banane, wenn die Kamera schnell gedreht wird gibt es dazu grauenhafte Artefakte um die Figur rum. Der Modus ist eher so ein sightseeing feature, bringt aber mehr Nachteile als Vorteile im Spielablauf.
Der Trigger-Effekt auf R2 bei der Pistole ist imo absolut nervig. (Zum Glück abschaltbar).

-Immortals Fenix Rising (PS5 Demo)
Optik ok-isch. Gameplay, vor allem im Kampf, absolut generisch und belanglos.

- Destruction Allstars
Genau wie erwartet, Gameplay ist nicht meins. Die absolut nervige, pseudo coole Aufmachung tut ihr übriges. Dann lieber eher ne Runde good old Rocket League.

[Hokurn]

Das kann ich gut verstehen, da Chars mir ja auch fast immer sehr wichtig sind. Ist sogar gegenüber ebenso ein Grund, warum ich mich immer so schwer tue mit Zelda. Link gibt mir einfach überhaupt nichts, leider.
Eine Ausnahme ist Wind Waker mit Toon Link. Das cartoonige macht mir da schon echt viel aus.

Ist halt auch viel kindliche Nostalgie...

Ich bin mittlerweile auf jeden Fall heiß drauf, auch durch deine Beschreibung hier im Thread. Danke dafür. Aktuell sitze ich noch an Blue Dragon und Yakuza 5, die mich beide noch (mindestens) diese Woche beschäftigen, aber danach steht Monster Sanctuary auf dem Plan. Hört sich alles in allem nach einer interessanten Mischung an.

Ich bin gespannt, ob es dir taugt.

[Ernesto Heidenreich]

@myn4

Würde ich schon sagen, dass sich die Nioh Collection lohnt, vor allem wenn man den zweiten Teil noch garnicht gespielt hat. Es sind ja zwei Spiele incl. aller DLC's am Start, wobei auch die DLC's für Teil eins sehr sehr gut waren.

Hattest du die DLC's von Teil 1 damals gespielt ?

Ich habe meine PS4 Niohs verkauft und freue mich nun nochmal Teil 1 mit anderem Build ( Doppel Katana + Tonfa ) incl. der DLC's anzugehen.

God of War werde ich mir heute Abend mal ansehen.
Die Demo zu Immortal Fenix habe ich auch gespielt und fands ganz okay. Aber nicht für Vollpreis ^^. Destruction Allstars wird mich auch nicht lange vereinnahmen.

[Hokurn]

Ist die Among Us Wertung so abwegig? Find jetzt nach nur einer Runde (also keiner wirklich fundierten Meinung) ein "befriedigend" nicht so wirklich unrealistisch.

[Gast]

Among Us ist jetzt kein Test oder Wertung den ich für abwegig halte. Die Meinungen gehen dazu einfach sehr auseinander. Wobei 95% Steam positiv Bewertungen schon ordentlich sind. Und ich gönne dem Spiel seinen Erfolg auch. Finde nur das ist wirklich kein Fazit das man skandalisieren sollte. Da gab es schon andere Hämmer. Den Vogel schießt für mich persönlich immer noch Mafia ab.

Davon abgesehen fand ich diese Nominierung zum Wunschtest von Anfang an komplett unnötig. Das Spiel hätte aufgrund seiner Beliebtheit einfach keinen Test mehr gebraucht. Da hätte es weitaus interessante Titel gegeben... aber so funktioniert Demokratie manchmal eben. Die Mehrheit gewinnt.

[cM0]

@cM0
Bzgl. des Gesprächs letztens mit Verteilung der Tester usw.
...

also Michael hat nun den Among Us Test geschrieben.
Joa... dazu kann ich auch nicht viel mehr sagen

Ich habe Among Us selbst nicht gespielt, kann dazu also nicht viel sagen. Aber unabhängig von der Wertung klingt der Test nachvollziehbar. Mit den richtigen Leuten kann man damit sicher auch länger Spaß haben, wenn man Spaß am Spielprinzip hat. Micha hat es immerhin zusammen mit Jan gespielt und laut Screenshot war auch Jörg dabei (könnte auch ein anderer Jörg sein). Aber ich kann mir auch vorstellen, dass die Idee sich abnutzt. Schwer zu sagen, ohne es selbst gespielt zu haben.

@cM0:

Oh Dragon Quests... hoffentlich kommen sie nochmal wieder. 7 hatte ich auf der PSX importiert und durchgesuchtet, obwohl es grafisch kaum mehr als NES Niveau war. Dragon Quest 8 auf PS2 war auch großartig. 9 habe ich leider nie gespielt. Gab es bei uns auch nicht?
Das ist eine Serie die für mich persönlich Final Fantasy inzwischen in allen Belangen ersetzt. Inzwischen kann ich mich sogar mit dem Midi Sound arrangieren.

Ich habe hier immerhin alle Dragon Quests liegen, die man für (3)DS bekommt. Ich glaube, das sind Teil IV bis IX, müsste ich mal nachgucken. Das einzige, was mich bisher von den Spielen abgehalten hat, ist, dass es auch wieder große Zeitfresser sind und nachdem was ich gehört hab, muss man recht viel grinden. Das kann Spaß machen, wenn es gut umgesetzt ist, wird mir aber wahrscheinlich nach einigen Stunden zu viel. Aber wenn die Story und das Kampfsystem passen, bleibe ich mit kleinen Unterbrechungen sicher trotzdem am Ball. Ich würde die Spiele schon gern irgendwann spielen, aber das wird dieses Jahr nichts mehr.

Ich bin mittlerweile auf jeden Fall heiß drauf, auch durch deine Beschreibung hier im Thread. Danke dafür. Aktuell sitze ich noch an Blue Dragon und Yakuza 5, die mich beide noch (mindestens) diese Woche beschäftigen, aber danach steht Monster Sanctuary auf dem Plan. Hört sich alles in allem nach einer interessanten Mischung an.

Ich bin gespannt, ob es dir taugt.

Ich werde auf jeden Fall berichten, ob es was für mich ist.

[Hokurn]

Ich werde auf jeden Fall berichten, ob es was für mich ist.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ich hab Control mal ausprobiert...
Viel Spielzeit hab ich noch nicht aber es war interessant und auch wenn ich jetzt gefühlt alles anfange find ich einen Third Person Shooter gar net so verkehrt.

[Gast]

Ich habe hier immerhin alle Dragon Quests liegen, die man für (3)DS bekommt. Ich glaube, das sind Teil IV bis IX, müsste ich mal nachgucken. Das einzige, was mich bisher von den Spielen abgehalten hat, ist, dass es auch wieder große Zeitfresser sind und nachdem was ich gehört hab, muss man recht viel grinden. Das kann Spaß machen, wenn es gut umgesetzt ist, wird mir aber wahrscheinlich nach einigen Stunden zu viel. Aber wenn die Story und das Kampfsystem passen, bleibe ich mit kleinen Unterbrechungen sicher trotzdem am Ball. Ich würde die Spiele schon gern irgendwann spielen, aber das wird dieses Jahr nichts mehr.

Kannst ja mal Dragon Quest Tact versuchen, was gerade für Mobile erschienen ist. Habs mir sogar mal drauf geknallt, obwohl ich wirklich kein Handy Gamer bin. Gacha ist eigentlich auch net meins, aber find es bisher ganz nett gemacht und bringt das DQ Flair voll rüber. Bin schon ein Fan der Reihe, aber ja - Zeitaufwand ist dabei sehr hoch. Meist gehen die Kämpfe aber sehr schnell von der Hand, wodurch der Grind zumindest nicht unnötig in die Länge gezogen wird.

Grad gesehen. Es soll ein Remake von Dragon Quest 9 für die Switch kommen. Da hat sich das Warten gelohnt. Hätte mir die überteuerte 3DS Fassung schon mal fast eingesackt.

Apropos Blue Dragon. Taugt der DS Teil irgendwas?

[Scorplian]

Mir gings bei Among Us nur darum, dass Michael ja sonst eher so Sim Racer usw. zockt.
Allein der erste Abschnitt des Tests spricht halt schon Bände bzgl. seiner Einstellung zum Design des Spiels.

Edit:
Ich meine er schreibt da, dass er die Optik abstoßend findet und es schwer findet diese miese Präsentation länger zu ertragen.



Vielleicht bin ich da etwas zu harmlos, aber ich wüsste nicht mal die Optik eines Spiels als abstoßend bezeichnet zu haben. Trotz dessen, dass mich einiges nicht überzeugen kann.
Außer vielleicht wenn ich überrissen mit Freunden rumblödel

[Gast]

Vlt etwas Offtopic, aber Thomas Mahler, also der redselige und gerne mal zum Anecken neigende Chefentwickler hinter den beiden Ori Spielen, hatte in seinem Rant letztens das hier bzgl. Cyberpunk 2077 und CDPR zu sagen:

Spoiler

Show

This is something that's been bothering me for a while and I get kinda riled up about it every time I see it unfold. And every time it keeps happening, people keep falling for it...

It all started with Molyneux. He was the master of 'Instead of telling you what my product is, let me just go wild with what I think it could be and get you all excited!" - And that was fine, until you actually put your money down and then the game was nothing like what Peter was hyping it up to be. He pulled this shit for a good decade or more with journalists and gamers loving listening to Uncle Peter and the amazing things he's doing for the industry. It took him to release some pretty damn shoddy games for press and gamers to finally not listen to the lies anymore.

Then came Sean Murray, who apparently had learned straight from the Peter Molyneux handbook. This guy apparently just loooooved the spotlight. Even days before No Man's Sky released, he hyped up the Multiplayer that didn't even exist and was all too happy to let people think that No Man's Sky was 'Minecraft in Space', where you could literally do everything (you being able to do everything is generally a common theme behind the gaming snake oil salesmen, cause hey, that sorta attracts everybody!). Obviously there was massive backlash when No Man's Sky finally released and the product being nothing like what Murray hyped it up to be. But what happened then? They released a bunch of updates, so let's forget about the initial lies and deception and hey, let's actually shower him with awards again, cause he finally kinda sorta delivered on what he said the game would be years earlier. Thanks, Geoff Keighley. Rewarding that kinda behavior will surely help the industry grow stronger.

And then came Cyberpunk. Made by the guys that made Witcher 3, so this shit had to be good. Here's our Cyberpunk universe and - trust us - you can do fucking everything! Here the entire CDPR PR department took all the cues from what worked for Molyneux and Murray and just went completely apeshit with it. Gamers were to believe that this is "Sci-Fi GTA in First Person". What's not to love? Every video released by CDPR was carefully crafted to create a picture in players minds that was just insanely compelling. They stopped just short of outright saying that this thing would cure cancer. This strategy resulted in a sensational 8 million pre-orders. What happened then was this: The product was a fraction of what the developer hyped it up to be and on top of that it barely even ran on consoles that it was supposed to 'run surprisingly well on!'.

I'd argue that all 3 of those are clear examples of you folks all being made fools of. And even the 'journalists' in this industry happily played along, each and every single time.

And let me also say, from the perspective of a developer, all of this just sucks. Back in 2014, I remember some journalist from some big publication telling us that Ori almost got the cover article of some magazine I read frequently, but ultimately they had to pick No Man's Sky cause it was the 'bigger game'. I kinda agreed back then, thinking to myself: "Ok, I get it, they have to promote the bigger game, they obviously have to go for the clicks. Sucks, but that's how the game is played." But then I really felt bamboozled once No Man's Sky came out and it became clear that all this hype was really just built on lies and the honest guy who just showed his actual product really got kicked in the balls because the lying guy was able to make up some tall tales that held absolutely no substance.

I know this whole thread might come off as me sounding bitter and I'm sure there'll be some people that see this as me shitting on other devs. No, I'm not. I'm shitting on liars and people that are okay with openly deceiving others. I'd argue that we should all agree that this shit is not okay. If I go and buy a car and the car salesman sells me a car that supposedly has 300 horse power, but on the drive home after the purchase I notice that he switched out the motor when I wasn't looking, I'd be rightfully pissed off, cause I was deceived.

And yet, gamers and journalists don't really seem to mind all that much. Yeah, the backlash is coming, but usually you see a ton of people then arguing that they like the game that came out of it anyway. That is so not the point. It doesn't matter if the snake oil actually tastes fine. Don't sell me on features that don't exist. Don't paint a picture that you'll not be able to deliver. Just don't fucking lie to me. You're fucking over gamers, you're fucking over journalists (that should know better, so shame on you!) and you're fucking over other developers.

There, I said my piece, felt like a chip I needed to get off my shoulder and I think this is a wrong that we should set right so that this won't happen anymore.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-ar ... en.372420/

[johndoe1197293]

Spoiler

Show

Vlt etwas Offtopic, aber Thomas Mahler, also der redselige und gerne mal zum Anecken neigende Chefentwickler hinter den beiden Ori Spielen, hatte in seinem Rant letztens das hier bzgl. Cyberpunk 2077 und CDPR zu sagen:

Spoiler

Show

This is something that's been bothering me for a while and I get kinda riled up about it every time I see it unfold. And every time it keeps happening, people keep falling for it...

It all started with Molyneux. He was the master of 'Instead of telling you what my product is, let me just go wild with what I think it could be and get you all excited!" - And that was fine, until you actually put your money down and then the game was nothing like what Peter was hyping it up to be. He pulled this shit for a good decade or more with journalists and gamers loving listening to Uncle Peter and the amazing things he's doing for the industry. It took him to release some pretty damn shoddy games for press and gamers to finally not listen to the lies anymore.

Then came Sean Murray, who apparently had learned straight from the Peter Molyneux handbook. This guy apparently just loooooved the spotlight. Even days before No Man's Sky released, he hyped up the Multiplayer that didn't even exist and was all too happy to let people think that No Man's Sky was 'Minecraft in Space', where you could literally do everything (you being able to do everything is generally a common theme behind the gaming snake oil salesmen, cause hey, that sorta attracts everybody!). Obviously there was massive backlash when No Man's Sky finally released and the product being nothing like what Murray hyped it up to be. But what happened then? They released a bunch of updates, so let's forget about the initial lies and deception and hey, let's actually shower him with awards again, cause he finally kinda sorta delivered on what he said the game would be years earlier. Thanks, Geoff Keighley. Rewarding that kinda behavior will surely help the industry grow stronger.

And then came Cyberpunk. Made by the guys that made Witcher 3, so this shit had to be good. Here's our Cyberpunk universe and - trust us - you can do fucking everything! Here the entire CDPR PR department took all the cues from what worked for Molyneux and Murray and just went completely apeshit with it. Gamers were to believe that this is "Sci-Fi GTA in First Person". What's not to love? Every video released by CDPR was carefully crafted to create a picture in players minds that was just insanely compelling. They stopped just short of outright saying that this thing would cure cancer. This strategy resulted in a sensational 8 million pre-orders. What happened then was this: The product was a fraction of what the developer hyped it up to be and on top of that it barely even ran on consoles that it was supposed to 'run surprisingly well on!'.

I'd argue that all 3 of those are clear examples of you folks all being made fools of. And even the 'journalists' in this industry happily played along, each and every single time.

And let me also say, from the perspective of a developer, all of this just sucks. Back in 2014, I remember some journalist from some big publication telling us that Ori almost got the cover article of some magazine I read frequently, but ultimately they had to pick No Man's Sky cause it was the 'bigger game'. I kinda agreed back then, thinking to myself: "Ok, I get it, they have to promote the bigger game, they obviously have to go for the clicks. Sucks, but that's how the game is played." But then I really felt bamboozled once No Man's Sky came out and it became clear that all this hype was really just built on lies and the honest guy who just showed his actual product really got kicked in the balls because the lying guy was able to make up some tall tales that held absolutely no substance.

I know this whole thread might come off as me sounding bitter and I'm sure there'll be some people that see this as me shitting on other devs. No, I'm not. I'm shitting on liars and people that are okay with openly deceiving others. I'd argue that we should all agree that this shit is not okay. If I go and buy a car and the car salesman sells me a car that supposedly has 300 horse power, but on the drive home after the purchase I notice that he switched out the motor when I wasn't looking, I'd be rightfully pissed off, cause I was deceived.

And yet, gamers and journalists don't really seem to mind all that much. Yeah, the backlash is coming, but usually you see a ton of people then arguing that they like the game that came out of it anyway. That is so not the point. It doesn't matter if the snake oil actually tastes fine. Don't sell me on features that don't exist. Don't paint a picture that you'll not be able to deliver. Just don't fucking lie to me. You're fucking over gamers, you're fucking over journalists (that should know better, so shame on you!) and you're fucking over other developers.

There, I said my piece, felt like a chip I needed to get off my shoulder and I think this is a wrong that we should set right so that this won't happen anymore.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-ar ... en.372420/

Hast du den Thread verfolgt? Was war der Grund für die Schließung? (Ich habe jetzt keine Lust den kompletten Thread durchzulesen )

[Gast]

Spoiler

Show

Vlt etwas Offtopic, aber Thomas Mahler, also der redselige und gerne mal zum Anecken neigende Chefentwickler hinter den beiden Ori Spielen, hatte in seinem Rant letztens das hier bzgl. Cyberpunk 2077 und CDPR zu sagen:

Spoiler

Show

This is something that's been bothering me for a while and I get kinda riled up about it every time I see it unfold. And every time it keeps happening, people keep falling for it...

It all started with Molyneux. He was the master of 'Instead of telling you what my product is, let me just go wild with what I think it could be and get you all excited!" - And that was fine, until you actually put your money down and then the game was nothing like what Peter was hyping it up to be. He pulled this shit for a good decade or more with journalists and gamers loving listening to Uncle Peter and the amazing things he's doing for the industry. It took him to release some pretty damn shoddy games for press and gamers to finally not listen to the lies anymore.

Then came Sean Murray, who apparently had learned straight from the Peter Molyneux handbook. This guy apparently just loooooved the spotlight. Even days before No Man's Sky released, he hyped up the Multiplayer that didn't even exist and was all too happy to let people think that No Man's Sky was 'Minecraft in Space', where you could literally do everything (you being able to do everything is generally a common theme behind the gaming snake oil salesmen, cause hey, that sorta attracts everybody!). Obviously there was massive backlash when No Man's Sky finally released and the product being nothing like what Murray hyped it up to be. But what happened then? They released a bunch of updates, so let's forget about the initial lies and deception and hey, let's actually shower him with awards again, cause he finally kinda sorta delivered on what he said the game would be years earlier. Thanks, Geoff Keighley. Rewarding that kinda behavior will surely help the industry grow stronger.

And then came Cyberpunk. Made by the guys that made Witcher 3, so this shit had to be good. Here's our Cyberpunk universe and - trust us - you can do fucking everything! Here the entire CDPR PR department took all the cues from what worked for Molyneux and Murray and just went completely apeshit with it. Gamers were to believe that this is "Sci-Fi GTA in First Person". What's not to love? Every video released by CDPR was carefully crafted to create a picture in players minds that was just insanely compelling. They stopped just short of outright saying that this thing would cure cancer. This strategy resulted in a sensational 8 million pre-orders. What happened then was this: The product was a fraction of what the developer hyped it up to be and on top of that it barely even ran on consoles that it was supposed to 'run surprisingly well on!'.

I'd argue that all 3 of those are clear examples of you folks all being made fools of. And even the 'journalists' in this industry happily played along, each and every single time.

And let me also say, from the perspective of a developer, all of this just sucks. Back in 2014, I remember some journalist from some big publication telling us that Ori almost got the cover article of some magazine I read frequently, but ultimately they had to pick No Man's Sky cause it was the 'bigger game'. I kinda agreed back then, thinking to myself: "Ok, I get it, they have to promote the bigger game, they obviously have to go for the clicks. Sucks, but that's how the game is played." But then I really felt bamboozled once No Man's Sky came out and it became clear that all this hype was really just built on lies and the honest guy who just showed his actual product really got kicked in the balls because the lying guy was able to make up some tall tales that held absolutely no substance.

I know this whole thread might come off as me sounding bitter and I'm sure there'll be some people that see this as me shitting on other devs. No, I'm not. I'm shitting on liars and people that are okay with openly deceiving others. I'd argue that we should all agree that this shit is not okay. If I go and buy a car and the car salesman sells me a car that supposedly has 300 horse power, but on the drive home after the purchase I notice that he switched out the motor when I wasn't looking, I'd be rightfully pissed off, cause I was deceived.

And yet, gamers and journalists don't really seem to mind all that much. Yeah, the backlash is coming, but usually you see a ton of people then arguing that they like the game that came out of it anyway. That is so not the point. It doesn't matter if the snake oil actually tastes fine. Don't sell me on features that don't exist. Don't paint a picture that you'll not be able to deliver. Just don't fucking lie to me. You're fucking over gamers, you're fucking over journalists (that should know better, so shame on you!) and you're fucking over other developers.

There, I said my piece, felt like a chip I needed to get off my shoulder and I think this is a wrong that we should set right so that this won't happen anymore.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-ar ... en.372420/

Hast du den Thread verfolgt? Was war der Grund für die Schließung? (Ich habe jetzt keine Lust den kompletten Thread durchzulesen )

Anscheinend Zoff, weil seitens ein paar User vorgeworfen wurde, dass auch das letzte Ori Spiel buggy gewesen sein soll:

And no, The day 1 patch didn’t fix shit
It was broken on Xbox One when I played it too with crashes and performance issues
Journalists should be strict only when it’s not your game is it now?

My dude... This journalist played the unpatched version that was 4-5 months old. He did for some reason not even get the version that MS told us would be the one that journalists would use to review the game. So since players would never see that version, I think it's more than fair to ask him to look at the stuff through the right lense. And yes, if he didn't like that version, he should've rated it accordingly, of course! That journalist actually then rated the game up 20 points or so cause he thought it played a lot better than the version he initially got. There was nothing deceptive there, sorry to disappoint you.

/edit: Und das hier auch noch:

Spoiler

Show

[johndoe1197293]

Spoiler

Show

Spoiler

Show

Vlt etwas Offtopic, aber Thomas Mahler, also der redselige und gerne mal zum Anecken neigende Chefentwickler hinter den beiden Ori Spielen, hatte in seinem Rant letztens das hier bzgl. Cyberpunk 2077 und CDPR zu sagen:

https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-ar ... en.372420/

Hast du den Thread verfolgt? Was war der Grund für die Schließung? (Ich habe jetzt keine Lust den kompletten Thread durchzulesen )

Anscheinend Zoff, weil seitens ein paar User vorgeworfen wurde, dass auch das letzte Ori Spiel buggy gewesen sein soll:

And no, The day 1 patch didn’t fix shit
It was broken on Xbox One when I played it too with crashes and performance issues
Journalists should be strict only when it’s not your game is it now?

My dude... This journalist played the unpatched version that was 4-5 months old. He did for some reason not even get the version that MS told us would be the one that journalists would use to review the game. So since players would never see that version, I think it's more than fair to ask him to look at the stuff through the right lense. And yes, if he didn't like that version, he should've rated it accordingly, of course! That journalist actually then rated the game up 20 points or so cause he thought it played a lot better than the version he initially got. There was nothing deceptive there, sorry to disappoint you.

/edit: Und das hier auch noch:

Spoiler

Show

Danke!

[History Eraser]

So, wie er es in seinem Rant abgelassen hat, stimmt das ja aber auch alles.

Als ich in No Mans Sky das erste mal meinen Planeten verlassen habe und im Weltraum erstmal wieder die oben/unten/links/rechts Orientierung wiederfinden musste, war das trotzdem total geil und ich hab mein Eintrittsgeld nicht bereut, da ich noch 20 weitere Stunden damit verbracht habe. Mit Cyberpunk geht es mir ähnlich, ein geiles Spiel, aber halt erst ab Series X / PC.

Ist natürlich doof, das Ori 2 dann anscheinend ohne Day 1 Patch auch nicht fluffig läuft. xD